|
|
"Ten years ago, we did
redistricting with software and hardware that was bulky, difficult to
use, and extraordinarily expensive. Today, Maptitude software provides
us far more flexibility, ease of use, and capability at a fraction of
the cost. Following redistricting, we will be able to continue to use
Maptitude for GIS/data applications ranging from school bus
transportation to land use development issues."
Russell T. Larson
Delaware Controller General
|
|
"Maptitude for Redistricting has immense capability -- it's done
everything we've asked and more. Plus, our web site, which uses
Maptitude for the Web, will provide an easy way for the public to access
the redistricting process. The staff at Caliper has been responsive and
helpful when we've had questions."
Anonymous State Redistricting Office Director
|
|
|
"We have used Maptitude for Redistricting in the West Virginia Legislative Redistricting Office since the 2000
Census. I have also helped West Virginia counties use Maptitude for their realignment of magisterial districts and
precincts. I have nothing but great comments, opinions, and experiences with this product. First and foremost it is
VERY user-friendly. An individual with NO GIS experience can be trained to use it in a two-day session. Caliper
provides comprehensive manuals and detailed training materials, and the technical support is outstanding. There are
so many additional functions for creating professional presentations. I highly recommend Maptitude."
Jo Vaughan
Chair, West Virginia Legislative Redistricting Office
|
|
"So far I have found the product support from Caliper to be of high quality. Howard's staff are helpful when
you have questions. In general, I am pleased with the output that Maptitude can produce, and I think it will provide
us with a superior set of maps and reports for redistricting. Finally Maptitude was recommended to me by a panel of
GIS staff who worked for our Universities Research Center. These staff persons had been my technical support staff
for redistricting in the 2000's, and had served in this capacity for my predecessor in the 1990's. Their belief was
that the Caliper Maptitude product was superior to all others and recommended that I purchase it for the 2010 round of
redistricting."
Anonymous State Redistricting Office Director
|
|
|
"I find Maptitude reasonably intuitive to use. Some functions and fancy maps require a little more knowledge but it is
all learnable. The actual plan making is very simple to use and the data may be presented in different formats. One
advantage this cycle may be that Caliper had the contract to do the underlying programming for the Census Bureau so I
would expect everything to work seamlessly.
I have also found Caliper willing to make changes suggested by users. To me, this is a primary advantage. They constantly
improve their product. I can't give you a point to point comparison because I am not familiar with the competing software.
I can tell you that the political operatives used the other software last time and when they saw us use Maptitude, they
thought it would have been better."
Anonymous State Redistricting Office Director
|
|
The redistricting tools in Maptitude are significantly more advanced than Autobound, and Maptitude is much faster
at key steps. In one state, we were sharing plans across a team of three GIS technicians and among about 3 public
groups who had their own GIS capability. Our team and the two outside groups could create an equivalency file, put
it on a disk to share, and get it open and fully working on another Maptitude computer in under 10 minutes. We would
often provide and receive plans in the fifteen minutes before a Redistricting Commission meeting began, and then all
of us could view and discuss the plans live on any computer for the hearing. The one poor guy using Autobound took
between one and four HOURS to import an equivalency file, depending on the number of districts in the plan, so he
typically had to look on with someone's Maptitude software during the meeting.
"
Douglas Johnson
National Demographics Corporation
|
|
|
"Our redistricting office purchased Maptitude for Redistricting in 2000, and it was an absolute wonderful buy!
The software is easy to use, and you do not have to be a super computer wizard to use it efficiently. We have a small
staff of about 5 during non-redistricting years, but ramp up in preparation for the coming Census, so it was important
that we have a product that could be learned easily in a short period of time by temporary staff.
Caliper and their staff have been very responsive. Howard Simkowitz and Tracy Horgan have just been a dream to work
with. The usual response time when we have had questions or problems has been within 24 hours.
There was plenty of research and time taken when the product was chosen. I am not saying that there were no problems,
because there were some kinks in the early product, but those were addressed quickly in updated versions. I think that
in comparison to other software that is out there, Maptitude really speaks to the needs of the Redistricting community.
When they were in the development stages, our office worked with them on what was needed and what the expectation would
be for a powerful software solution – in my opinion they delivered."
Anonymous State Redistricting Office Director
|
|
"We used Maptitude for Redistricting in 2001 and found it fit all our needs and then some. The product is easy to
learn and user friendly. All the users had very few problems and could do everything that was required by the
process. I highly recommend Maptitude. You do not have to be a GIS guru to get the job done. The software is very
easy to understand. You can have a lot of preset things so they just use templates and standard formats that you
develop and deploy.
If you want you can develop other uses for the software after you are done with redistricting. It is not just
limited to redistricting. We have kept 5 licenses and we will probably continue to use the product for 2011
redistricting. I can't see why we would not use it. The tech support was outstanding. Any and all questions and
or problems we had were resolved as quickly as possible and never delayed our process here. If we asked for something
Caliper was very accommodating and responsive. Could not have been better."
Anonymous State Redistricting Office Director
|
|
The Rose Institute at Claremont McKenna College conducts and publishes
research primarily on California government and politics. Using computer
technology, students and faculty in the Rose Institute advance knowledge
about politics and help create services that make the political process
more democratic. The Rose Institute uses Maptitude, Maptitude for
Redistricting, Maptitude for Precinct and Election Management, and
Political Maptitude. Here is what the Rose Institute has to say about
Caliper Corporation in its 2005 report,
"Restoring the Competitive Edge: California's Need
for Redistricting Reform and the Likely Impact of Proposition 77":
"Their longstanding and generous support makes possible all of the Rose
Institute's demographic, redistricting, and geographic information
systems (GIS) research. Their outstanding, powerful and easy-to-use
Maptitude software enables us to train our students up from GIS novices
to expert users in only a few hours, and the software's extensive
analytic capabilities provide the service and power needed for our
work."
Maptitude for Redistricting was featured in a December 2003
New Yorker Article, "The
Great Election Grab," by Jeffrey Toobin. Here are a few excerpts:
I asked [assistant professor of law and political science Nathaniel]
Persily to give me a demonstration of how to draw district lines. He
moved his mouse to the border between two congressional districts. A
ledger on the top half of the screen showed that one of the districts,
as currently configured, had about forty thousand more people than the
other one. The Supreme Court has said that the requirement of one man,
one vote means that each district must have exactlyexactlythe same
number of people, Persily explained. An early version of the
Pennsylvania plan was rejected by the courts because the districts were
just nineteen voters apart, in districts of about a half million people.
Requirements for that sort of precision virtually mandate the use of
computers for redistricting.
Persily zeroed in even more closely, and a little donkey popped up
inside one of the census blocks. Thats where the local congressman
lives, a Democrat, he explained. We have little elephants for the
Republican incumbents. [Maptitude for Redistricting] seemed easy to use,
justifying the boast, on the software companys Web site, that you could
start building plans thirty minutes after opening the box. Persily
chuckled. At a certain point, you admire the video-game appeal of all
this.
Maptitude for Redistricting was featured in a April 24, 2001
Wall Street Journal Article, "Software Makes
Redistricting Easier, Accessible," by Will Pinkston. Nearly everyone
interviewed for the article uses Maptitude for Redistricting. Here are a
few excerpts:
In New Jersey, when a committee of five Republicans
and five Democrats chosen by their parties couldn't agree on how to
redraw the state's legislative boundaries, the state supreme court
tapped Larry Bartels (bartels@princeton.edu
), a Princeton University professor, to break the impasse. After 10 days
locked away in a hotel with the two sides, the professor emerged with a
resolution: an entire state redistricting map drawn on a laptop
computer, using [Maptitude for Redistricting].
Cheaper software is letting independent consultants
in the game, too. George Meier (georgemeier@prodigy.net),
former staff director of Florida's House reapportionment committee, had
to requisition $600,000 in computer software and equipment in 1991 to
draft new electoral district boundaries. This year, as a redistricting
expert freelancing for cities and counties in Florida [using Maptitude
for Redistricting], his overhead is considerably lower: He got
everything he needs loaded onto his Dell laptop for under $4,000. And
Baltimore civil-rights attorney Samuel L. Walters (slwalters@earthlink.net
)is using [Maptitude for Redistricting] to pitch his expertise to
minority groups and local governments. Mr. Walters, who worked for the
NAACP during 1991's redistricting, says he expects to quickly recoup his
costs.
[Caliper Corporation] actually came to market with
one of the first affordable programs just after the [1990] census. Since
then, Caliper has sold Maptitude to more than half of the country's
legislatures and dozens of interest groups.
Maptitude for Redistricting was featured in a May 8, 2001
Baltimore Sun Article, "Redistricting Options Grow with
Technology," by Michael Dresser:
Governor Glendening, Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller and House
Speaker Casper R. Taylor are using Maptitude for Redistricting to carve
Maryland into eight congressional and 47 legislative districts. Karl Aro,
director of the Department of Legislative Services, is impressed with
the Maptitude program the state has bought from Caliper Corp. in Netwon,
Massachusetts. "It's light years ahead. The software can do so much
more, so much more quickly," he said. " Aro expects his department,
which serves legislators of both parties, to be drawing maps for a lot
of members this year. The Maryland Republican Party has the Maptitude
program, too. Political consultants around the country are also finding
the software affordable.
Back to Our Clients
|